yinyang

A fuzzing framework for SMT solvers

Showing:

Popularity

Downloads/wk

0

GitHub Stars

113

Maintenance

Last Commit

21d ago

Contributors

9

Package

Dependencies

1

License

Categories

Readme

portfolio_view


yinyang

A fuzzing framework for SMT solvers. Given a set of seed SMT formulas, yinyang generates mutant formulas to stress-test SMT solvers. yinyang can be used to robustify SMT solvers. It already found 1,500+ bugs in the two state-of-the-art SMT solvers Z3 and CVC4.

Installation

To install a stable version of yinyang use:

pip3 install yinyang

To install the most recent version, check out the repository:

git clone https://github.com/testsmt/yinyang.git                        
pip3 install antlr4-python3-runtime==4.9.2                                   

Note that you may want to add yinyang/bin to your PATH, for running yinyang conveniently without prefix.

Usage

  1. Get SMT-LIB 2 benchmarks. Edit scripts/SMT-LIB-clone.sh to select the logics for testing. Run ./scripts/SMT-LIB-clone.sh to download the corresponding SMT-LIB 2 benchmarks. Alternatively, you can download benchmarks directly from the SMT-LIB website or supply your own benchmarks.

  2. Get and build SMT solvers for testing. Install two or more SMT solvers that support the SMT-LIB 2 format. You may find it convenient to add them to your PATH.

  3. Run yinyang on the benchmarks e.g. with Z3 and CVC4.

typefuzz "z3 model_validate=true;cvc4 --check-models -m -i -q" benchmarks 

yinyang will by default randomly select formulas from the folder ./benchmarks and generate 300 mutants per seed formula. If a bug has been found, the bug trigger is stored in ./bugs. yinyang will run in an infinite loop. You can use the shortcut CTRL+C to terminate yinyang manually.

📘 Documentation

Feedback

For bugs/issues/questions/feature requests please file an issue. We are always happy to receive your feedback or help you adjust yinyang to the needs of your custom solver, help you build on yinyang, etc.

📬 Contact us

Additional Resources

Rate & Review

Great Documentation0
Easy to Use0
Performant0
Highly Customizable0
Bleeding Edge0
Responsive Maintainers0
Poor Documentation0
Hard to Use0
Slow0
Buggy0
Abandoned0
Unwelcoming Community0
100